Click Image to Watch!
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Watch CoreStates on CNBC!
Be sure to catch Bill Spiropoulos, President and CEO of CoreStates Capital Advisors, on CNBC:
Thursday, February 25th @ 10am
Thursday, March 5th @ Noon
Thursday, February 25th @ 10am
Thursday, March 5th @ Noon
Click HERE to watch Bill's recent appearance on CNBC
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Did You Know...
One of the critical differentiating factors at Corestates Capital Advisors is our strategic view of investing. Our mission is to sustain acceptable portfolio growth with limited risk. To accomplish this we believe portfolios can no longer be guided by predominantly domestic strategies because they tend to be overly-influenced by US Monetary Policy and US Foreign-Policy. Our 20/20 Global Vision encompasses the 20 critical global issues that will influence portfolio performance over the next 20 years. Listed below are the current 20 issues that we think will have enormous influence.
This YouTube video provides excellent reinforcement for our 20/20 Global Vision philosophy.
Click Here to watch on YouTube
This YouTube video provides excellent reinforcement for our 20/20 Global Vision philosophy.
Click Here to watch on YouTube
Monday, February 1, 2010
CoreStates News Channel- Welcome!
Welcome to CoreStates! Click the image below to watch:
Click image to watch!
Click image to watch! Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Keynes: Return of the Master (or courting disaster?)
Among the many valuable resources used by the investment professionals at CoreStates, Capitol Reader is a service (www.capitolreader.com) that provides detailed summaries of recently published books on politics and related topics. The following are CoreStates' perspectives on a recently summarized book describing and endorsing the economic principles currently gaining favor in Washington.
The above title, absent our parenthetical addition, is also the title of a just published book (Public Affairs Books; ISBN 9781586488277) by Robert Skidelsky, the preeminent biographer of British economist John Maynard Keynes (1883 – 1946). As the title suggests, Skidelsky considers Keynes to be “the Master,” and the book is a veritable celebration of his return to popularity following the recent “failure of capitalism.” And, Skidelsky is not alone. Keynes’ fans include President Barak Obama and the Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress.
The master . . .
Without question, Keynes contributed greatly to economic thought. His recognition of the discipline as a social/behavioral science as opposed to a mathematical exercise is invaluable in understanding the workings of an economy. Even today, we see too little appreciation for Keynes’ admonition that economists (and their private and public sector clients) not put too much confidence in quantitative economic analysis. Most aspects of the future are simply immeasurable – they are what he describes as unknowable “uncertainty,” not calculable “risk.” To assign probabilities to future economic measures is foolhardy. To act on them is irresponsible.
Or courting disaster?
But, we are troubled by one of the core tenants of Keynesian thought – the belief in the propriety of heavy-handed intervention by governments in their economies. In fact, we believe the recent “failure of capitalism” was more a failure of governments in implementing exactly what Keynes promotes – aggressive fiscal and monetary intervention. Such actions provide little measurable near-term benefit while invariably sowing the seeds of the next economic disaster.
The most recent economic meltdown is a good example. Between the Federal Reserve’s speculation-inducing too-easy money and too-low interest rates in response to past economic slowdowns, and Congress’s steadily ballooning deficit spending, private sector excesses were not only widely encouraged, but were willingly financed. Add Congress’ irresponsible relaxation of mortgage lending standards, and housing became the epicenter of the second worst economic collapse in our nation’s history, and the worst in terms of worldwide losses.
Not only did governments (especially ours) do what they shouldn’t have done, they also failed to do what they should have done. They shirked their responsibility to properly oversee and regulate their public and private sector enterprises. Free-market capitalism excels at building national wealth, but without proper constraints, it can result in unhealthy concentrations of private sector wealth and power, and in alternating excesses of optimism and pessimism. This, too, was a factor in the recent economic maelstrom.
An even more severe criticism of Keynesian principles comes from the Austrian School of economic thought led by Nobel Laureate Friedrich von Hayek. It opines that application of Keynes' policies inevitably leads to excessive state control if not pure socialism, to the severe detriment of international competitiveness, living standards, and personal freedoms.
The core strength of a capitalistic economy accrues from the multitude of small, largely self-interest-motivated economic decisions made daily by its millions of citizens. If properly regulated, this constantly evolving economic organism will produce a more effective, efficient, and stable economy than any central authority could ever be expected to achieve. To us, it’s the economic equivalent of democracy versus oligarchy. The economic “votes” of the citizenry will serve the economy better than the decisions of an elite few, no matter how well intentioned they may be.
Conflicting conclusions
Skidelsky concludes his arguments with the contention that Keynesian principles have historically delivered better economic results. He cites the period between 1951 and 2009, and suggests that what he identifies as the Keynesian period (1951 – 1973) saw higher GDP growth, less disparity of family incomes, and less unemployment than the Neo-Classical period (1980 – 2009). The inflation rate was slightly lower in the Neo-Classical period, but most importantly to Skidelsky, it suffered five periods of economic contraction versus none during the Keynesian period.
Our views differ, but not just for the reasons cited above. Even if government intervention can, or is believed to, moderate business cycles, it brings unintended and very unfavorable consequences. Individuals and companies throughout the economy see the moderated cycles as license to undertake increasingly risky behaviors (more debt, speculative trading, etc.). Eventually, these create excesses, often in the form of price bubbles, which are unsustainable and lead to collapsing markets that are beyond the government’s ability to contain, at least not without creating even more severe problems in the future. The financial system meltdown, still deflating housing bubble, and fiscally irresponsible government response provide a resounding example.
Much like the levees of New Orleans, the government “protections” espoused by Keynes and pursued by our government the last several years may have “worked.” But, they also created over-confidence and unwitting exposure to unpredictable and immeasurable calamities. In the end, these well-meaning “protections” exposed the citizenry to losses far in excess of what would have been incurred simply letting the economy (or river) flow through its natural cycles. Not only would the economic damage have been less, the public and private sector participants would have gained a better understanding of the risks and their responsibilities in a market-based economy.
www.corestates.us
The above title, absent our parenthetical addition, is also the title of a just published book (Public Affairs Books; ISBN 9781586488277) by Robert Skidelsky, the preeminent biographer of British economist John Maynard Keynes (1883 – 1946). As the title suggests, Skidelsky considers Keynes to be “the Master,” and the book is a veritable celebration of his return to popularity following the recent “failure of capitalism.” And, Skidelsky is not alone. Keynes’ fans include President Barak Obama and the Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress.
The master . . .
Without question, Keynes contributed greatly to economic thought. His recognition of the discipline as a social/behavioral science as opposed to a mathematical exercise is invaluable in understanding the workings of an economy. Even today, we see too little appreciation for Keynes’ admonition that economists (and their private and public sector clients) not put too much confidence in quantitative economic analysis. Most aspects of the future are simply immeasurable – they are what he describes as unknowable “uncertainty,” not calculable “risk.” To assign probabilities to future economic measures is foolhardy. To act on them is irresponsible.
Or courting disaster?
But, we are troubled by one of the core tenants of Keynesian thought – the belief in the propriety of heavy-handed intervention by governments in their economies. In fact, we believe the recent “failure of capitalism” was more a failure of governments in implementing exactly what Keynes promotes – aggressive fiscal and monetary intervention. Such actions provide little measurable near-term benefit while invariably sowing the seeds of the next economic disaster.
The most recent economic meltdown is a good example. Between the Federal Reserve’s speculation-inducing too-easy money and too-low interest rates in response to past economic slowdowns, and Congress’s steadily ballooning deficit spending, private sector excesses were not only widely encouraged, but were willingly financed. Add Congress’ irresponsible relaxation of mortgage lending standards, and housing became the epicenter of the second worst economic collapse in our nation’s history, and the worst in terms of worldwide losses.
Not only did governments (especially ours) do what they shouldn’t have done, they also failed to do what they should have done. They shirked their responsibility to properly oversee and regulate their public and private sector enterprises. Free-market capitalism excels at building national wealth, but without proper constraints, it can result in unhealthy concentrations of private sector wealth and power, and in alternating excesses of optimism and pessimism. This, too, was a factor in the recent economic maelstrom.
An even more severe criticism of Keynesian principles comes from the Austrian School of economic thought led by Nobel Laureate Friedrich von Hayek. It opines that application of Keynes' policies inevitably leads to excessive state control if not pure socialism, to the severe detriment of international competitiveness, living standards, and personal freedoms.
The core strength of a capitalistic economy accrues from the multitude of small, largely self-interest-motivated economic decisions made daily by its millions of citizens. If properly regulated, this constantly evolving economic organism will produce a more effective, efficient, and stable economy than any central authority could ever be expected to achieve. To us, it’s the economic equivalent of democracy versus oligarchy. The economic “votes” of the citizenry will serve the economy better than the decisions of an elite few, no matter how well intentioned they may be.
Conflicting conclusions
Skidelsky concludes his arguments with the contention that Keynesian principles have historically delivered better economic results. He cites the period between 1951 and 2009, and suggests that what he identifies as the Keynesian period (1951 – 1973) saw higher GDP growth, less disparity of family incomes, and less unemployment than the Neo-Classical period (1980 – 2009). The inflation rate was slightly lower in the Neo-Classical period, but most importantly to Skidelsky, it suffered five periods of economic contraction versus none during the Keynesian period.
Our views differ, but not just for the reasons cited above. Even if government intervention can, or is believed to, moderate business cycles, it brings unintended and very unfavorable consequences. Individuals and companies throughout the economy see the moderated cycles as license to undertake increasingly risky behaviors (more debt, speculative trading, etc.). Eventually, these create excesses, often in the form of price bubbles, which are unsustainable and lead to collapsing markets that are beyond the government’s ability to contain, at least not without creating even more severe problems in the future. The financial system meltdown, still deflating housing bubble, and fiscally irresponsible government response provide a resounding example.
Much like the levees of New Orleans, the government “protections” espoused by Keynes and pursued by our government the last several years may have “worked.” But, they also created over-confidence and unwitting exposure to unpredictable and immeasurable calamities. In the end, these well-meaning “protections” exposed the citizenry to losses far in excess of what would have been incurred simply letting the economy (or river) flow through its natural cycles. Not only would the economic damage have been less, the public and private sector participants would have gained a better understanding of the risks and their responsibilities in a market-based economy.
www.corestates.us
Friday, December 11, 2009
The Big Bounce UP... From What Looked Like the Bottomless Pit!
US stock indexes are some 25% higher than on January 1, and more than 60% above their March lows. Some technology sectors are up nearly 60% year-to-date, having more than doubled from their March lows.
Similarly, industrial metals are advancing strongly, and precious metals are hitting all-time highs. Even good quality corporate bonds have gained some 20% year-to-date while high yield indexes are up more than 50%.
Obviously, these markets are reflecting burgeoning confidence in economic recovery. TARP, the stimulus package, buyer incentives for homes and autos, and the Federal Reserve’s persistence in keeping interest rates low are having an impact!
...the yellow flag is out!
In fact, they’re having a dual impact. First, they appear to be helping pull us out of recession. Home sales have turned around, industrial capacity utilization is improving, and the unemployment rate has ticked down for the first time in several months.
These are the hoped-for results, and are certainly part of what is being reflected in the investment markets. But, it’s the unintended consequences that may be having the greatest impact, pushing not just stocks, but also bonds, precious metals and other assets to what can only be called inflated levels. And, not just in our domestic markets. Investors worldwide are doing exactly what should be expected from such governmental largesse, whether or not it is what those governments intended.
How the game is played.
And, what, exactly, is it that investors are doing? It’s merely the latest version of the “carry trade.”
1. They borrow (dollars in this instance) at the near-zero interest rates set by the Federal Reserve,
2. They use those borrowed dollars to invest in assets that appear undervalued, or at least capable of being bid up in price, and
3. They ultimately sell the assets, hopefully at sizeable gains, and repay the loans with “cheaper” dollars that are almost certain to have resulted from the ballooning Federal deficits.
Where does this leave investors like us here at CoreStates? We choose not to play this game. We never subject our clients to the risks of this form of “borrowing short and investing long,” having seen far too often (most recently in housing) how asset prices can suddenly drop when interest rates begin to rise and the throngs of debt-burdened “carry-traders” all stampede for the exits. But, we do have to deal with the volatile markets these traders help create with their high-risk games.
Our strategies in today’s environment of increasingly inflated prices are intended to participate in a good portion of any continuing run-up in asset prices, but to gradually lighten exposures as prices inflate. This investment approach is almost certain to mean that, unlike the extremely favorable performance we have been able to deliver through the market recovery to date, our clients may not fully participate in the latter stages of such an extreme market advance, but nor will they be fully exposed to the risks of a market collapse.
The way we look at it, the possibility of realizing modestly lagging returns if asset prices continue to inflate is simply the price that must be paid to assure better preservation of values when the bubble eventually bursts. And, this is the best way we know to fulfill our commitment to clients – to protect their lifestyles and preserve their legacies for as long as their investment assets are under our care.
We wish everyone a wonderful Holiday Season, and a safe and secure New Year!
The information provided above reflects the viewpoint of Corestates Capital Advisors, LLC and is subject to change. This article was prepared for general informational purposes only, without respect to the investment objectives, financial profile, or risk tolerance of any specific person or entity who may receive it.
Similarly, industrial metals are advancing strongly, and precious metals are hitting all-time highs. Even good quality corporate bonds have gained some 20% year-to-date while high yield indexes are up more than 50%.
Obviously, these markets are reflecting burgeoning confidence in economic recovery. TARP, the stimulus package, buyer incentives for homes and autos, and the Federal Reserve’s persistence in keeping interest rates low are having an impact!
...the yellow flag is out!
In fact, they’re having a dual impact. First, they appear to be helping pull us out of recession. Home sales have turned around, industrial capacity utilization is improving, and the unemployment rate has ticked down for the first time in several months.
These are the hoped-for results, and are certainly part of what is being reflected in the investment markets. But, it’s the unintended consequences that may be having the greatest impact, pushing not just stocks, but also bonds, precious metals and other assets to what can only be called inflated levels. And, not just in our domestic markets. Investors worldwide are doing exactly what should be expected from such governmental largesse, whether or not it is what those governments intended.
How the game is played.
And, what, exactly, is it that investors are doing? It’s merely the latest version of the “carry trade.”
1. They borrow (dollars in this instance) at the near-zero interest rates set by the Federal Reserve,
2. They use those borrowed dollars to invest in assets that appear undervalued, or at least capable of being bid up in price, and
3. They ultimately sell the assets, hopefully at sizeable gains, and repay the loans with “cheaper” dollars that are almost certain to have resulted from the ballooning Federal deficits.
Where does this leave investors like us here at CoreStates? We choose not to play this game. We never subject our clients to the risks of this form of “borrowing short and investing long,” having seen far too often (most recently in housing) how asset prices can suddenly drop when interest rates begin to rise and the throngs of debt-burdened “carry-traders” all stampede for the exits. But, we do have to deal with the volatile markets these traders help create with their high-risk games.
Our strategies in today’s environment of increasingly inflated prices are intended to participate in a good portion of any continuing run-up in asset prices, but to gradually lighten exposures as prices inflate. This investment approach is almost certain to mean that, unlike the extremely favorable performance we have been able to deliver through the market recovery to date, our clients may not fully participate in the latter stages of such an extreme market advance, but nor will they be fully exposed to the risks of a market collapse.
The way we look at it, the possibility of realizing modestly lagging returns if asset prices continue to inflate is simply the price that must be paid to assure better preservation of values when the bubble eventually bursts. And, this is the best way we know to fulfill our commitment to clients – to protect their lifestyles and preserve their legacies for as long as their investment assets are under our care.
We wish everyone a wonderful Holiday Season, and a safe and secure New Year!
The information provided above reflects the viewpoint of Corestates Capital Advisors, LLC and is subject to change. This article was prepared for general informational purposes only, without respect to the investment objectives, financial profile, or risk tolerance of any specific person or entity who may receive it.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Catch CoreStates on CNBC in December!
Be sure to catch Bill Spiropoulos, President and CEO of CoreStates Capital Advisors, on CNBC on the following dates in December:
Thursday, December 3rd at 5:00 AM on World Wide Exchange
Wednesday, December 9th at Noon on Power Lunch
Tuesday, December 22nd at Noon on Power Lunch
Wednesday, December 30th at Noon on Power Lunch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)